tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6500033298667240354.post5991336665087334699..comments2024-02-19T00:34:12.578-08:00Comments on Always Creative Geometry Problems plus Occasionally Annoying Philosophy: Fox 296 - Solutions8foxeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09567328431908997738noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6500033298667240354.post-7220607121557478762010-07-07T15:37:50.372-07:002010-07-07T15:37:50.372-07:00A new solution is added to this post.
Thank you Gi...A new solution is added to this post.<br />Thank you Giannno.8foxeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09567328431908997738noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6500033298667240354.post-16626239048718347712010-07-01T22:11:06.552-07:002010-07-01T22:11:06.552-07:00Good work!
296 is a strong statement. See it this ...Good work!<br />296 is a strong statement. See it this way: angle(AOC) can take any values between 0 and 180. Also note, for any value of angle(AOC), we can rotate the construction around point O, by 180-(AOC) degrees. Yet, we won't be able to find a construction satisfying "x, 2x, 3x" requirement.<br />Interesting!8foxeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09567328431908997738noreply@blogger.com